As for the entry itself—okay, I can stand a certain amount of sarcasm and sarcastic questions…but that was ridiculous. That was a dirty way to insult Dan and spin what he typed in his Agnosticism entry to make him seem like he hates all people who follow religion (and, while it isn’t true, you seem to forget that he placed atheism on the same level) and thinks they are all completely ignorant, simple-minded, stupid people. Maybe if you actually read the entry for the content, you’d have read something completely different. With the tone of his entry, you were probably looking for anything anti-religious, and “found” it—in other words, it was only there because you were looking for it. In reality, his entry was not anti-religious at all; it only explains his reasons for choosing to be agnostic as opposed to religious or atheist. I don’t think it’s cool to spin his entry to make it seem like he’s a complete ass. Haven’t known of you for long, but you’ve given me a terrible first impression…

I’m not nearly as excited about the Mel Gibson movie as you. Here’s why. Pardon me, my petulance is showing.

P.S. Why don’t you post some of your old comedy routines in text format on your web site? or maybe a couple MP3’s. I could use some chuckles right now.